Maybe You Shouldn't Read
This
By: Karen J.
Allen
Co-Publisher, On the
Gay
Horizon
I'm starting to wonder if maybe we shouldn't read anything.
Everything is spin. I sometimes question if we can even
recognize truth anymore.
The other day I read an article by some financial guru who
predicted that unemployment rates were going to start turning
around toward the end of the year. That some sectors of the job
market would continue to contract but that others would make up
the difference by showing new growth.
Great! I'm about to move and will need to find a job. I can
adapt and do something new and different. Perked me right up
and I trotted through the rest of my day feeling pretty
good.
Then,
yesterday, I read something else that pulled a quote from the
director of the Center for Labor Market Studies at Northeastern
University in Boston, "No immediate recovery of jobs is
anticipated, even if the recession officially ends, as some
have projected, by next fall. Since unemployment cannot begin
to fall until payroll growth hits about one percent - and
payroll growth will not hit one percent until [gross domestic
product] growth hits at least 2.5 percent to 3 percent - we may
not see any substantive payroll growth until late 2010 or 2011,
and unemployment could rise until that time."
Ugh! Not feeling so great. How risky is it to give up a
fairly decent job (even if its making me miserable) in a city
where I have quite a few contacts and go traipsing off to
someplace where I will be starting from scratch in the current
economy? Got a little scared and depressed and slunk through
the rest of the day.
Two articles taking statements from experts, no doubt out of
context, and using them to reinforce whatever point they were
trying to make. Much like our legal system where each side
hires their own experts. Please note I said "legal", not
"justice".
I do understand the temptation to embellish. There are so
many voices clamoring for attention that it feels like you have
to be louder or more outrageous or over the top in some way to
stand a chance of being heard. Years ago, I was naïve enough to
believe that people would see through the smoke. Look past
the mirrors. But pundits are celebrities, senators and
congressmen bow down to the likes of Rush Limbaugh and, while
venerable newspapers are now thought of as endangered species,
grocery store check-out aisles have never been so crowded with
National Enquirer clones.
I could list example after example. Like.....even
before President Obama named Federal Appeals Court
Judge Sonia Sotomayor as his pick for the Supreme Court,
Republicans were organizing their opposition. They were working
on their spin. And, yes, I do know that the Democrats would
have been doing the same thing.
That is the problem. It's more than that no one cares about
truth anymore. I'm not sure all that many even give it a
thought. It's all about winning.
I said that I understand the temptation to embellish. Trying
to come up with articles for this newsletter every week that
will be useful and, hopefully, entertaining is difficult. When
you know a lot about the belief system of your audience, it is
so easy to just allow yourself to write to that. Find issues
that push emotional buttons and then just spin away. Don't
antagonize anyone by trying to look at things impartially or
from the viewpoint of the other side. Unfortunately, we all
gravitate toward those who tell us what we want to hear. So,
playing that angle can make you very popular.
But at what cost?
To me, it feels like our world is spinning out of
control. We expect it in sales material but it's everywhere.
Perhaps of greatest importance to us is the spin used by those
most determined to deny the GLBT community equal rights. And,
yes, I think they are far worse, but don't we do the same thing
when we speak of the Religious Right?
Text books and the teachers who use them spin history based
on who's doing the retelling. I'm about to start the interview
process for a new job --- what do you want to bet I won't be
doing a bit of spinning of my own?
Politicians.....well, honestly, if you remove the spin,
would there be anything left to a politician? And when was the
last time you dated? Talk about spin! Even parents use
some pretty broad strokes when they paint pictures for their
kids --- from the evils of the world that they want them to
avoid to the rosy-colored haze they draw around the
difficulties of sustaining a marriage.
I could go on and on. I find myself putting books,
interesting appearing books, back on the shelf because there is
a little voice inside of me that asks, with increasing
regularity, "Why would you believe what this guy says?" There
used to be a distinct difference between fiction and
non-fiction. Today, we have a genre known as "creative
non-fiction". What is that? I think maybe more truth is to be
found in fiction where no one pretends it to be other than
a creative endeavor.
So, while I could keep going, I won't. But let me ask you
all a question. What exactly is truth? Is it what most people
believe? Like the world is flat --- until someone sails around
it? Or like the distinction between matter and energy --- until
someone discovers quarks and such? Or like "I will love and
want to be with you forever" --- until I don't?
Can truth change? Does truth change?
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - -
I was hoping for a response from some of our readers --- and
I still am. But as soon as I posted my initial draft on the
website that we use to store and edit material for the
newsletter, Ann-Marie took it and ran with it. So, instead of
an installment of Fit in a Year, we have A Response to
my musings on truth.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - -
-
A Response
By:
Ann-Marie
Giglio
Co-Publisher,
On the
Gay
Horizon
What about truth?
Is it the truth when a food label claims "0 Trans Fats" yet
actually contains 0.4gms per serving? With a manipulated
serving size? And what about the wrapper? No doubt
it says in large, bold letters: Trans-Fat Free. Is
that the truth?
Is it the truth when people say it's ok to do what you want
to do in your own bedroom, but then they vote against equal
rights? Were they lying about their attitude about
freedom?
Or do they use a different definition. And then which
definition is correct? In other words, true?
I had a teacher once--in high school of all places--who told
us that truth was an agreement. Nothing more, nothing
less. An agreement made amongst groups of people, between
couples, with our selves. And that the only way Truth
could survive was as long as people continued to agree that it
existed in the form they created for it.
That definition has always served me well. It's made
me conscious of the fragility of truth, even though we speak of
Truth as if it is cast in stone.
Take that AIDS walk. The truth of that walk was an
agreement amongst 45,000 people to walk peacefully through the
streets of Manhattan, rain or shine, to represent what we all
believed to be true: that AIDS is a devastating disease,
that more research is needed, and people currently ill must
have our help. Imagine if we hadn't agreed to be
nice.
But it wouldn't have taken much to break that
agreement. One person calling folks to arms. One
sleep-deprived or homophobic police officer annoyed with us for
shutting down traffic.
That's it. The agreement could have been broken in a
heartbeat.
The way our government has historically broken agreements
with us for most of my voting life. Telling us one thing,
while doing another.
The way friends have done the same thing. Many of us
have friends we no longer see because truth shifted on
us. Or they broke the agreement.
One year, we can all agree that Equal Rights for everyone is
the most important thing on Earth. And the next, Global
Warming can be the new Truth we all strive for.
The important thing about Truth is that what is true for
some is not always true for all, but if you have enough
agreement, we can pass laws. And we can turn off our
televisions and go outside. See if people are still
eating in restaurants. See if folks are still keeping
their grass mowed. The economy is not limited to the
speculative sector. Yes, that part tanked. It
always does. But it will be back. Speculators,
bottom feeders, wave riders--they're all still out
there.
But the truth is, so are we. And we just keep doing
what we do, putting one foot in front of the other, one step at
a time.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - -
-
Did we get a bit philosophical on you? I
know, we could have talked about how frustrated
and angry and hurt we all are about the California State
Supreme Court upholding Proposition 8. But we all
know that. We'll talk more about it another day. It's
certainly not over --- but things seem a lot
different than they did in November. I think we're all
daring to be more hopeful than we've ever
been.
So, maybe
you'll forgive us for our little spin on truth. Even
better, maybe you'll join us. Share your thoughts on truth ---
or Truth. We'd love to hear from you. Just write to us at
admin@onthegayhorizon.com .
|